
11 Sep
2012
11 Sep
'12
6:03 p.m.
Kim Phillips wrote:
no, my patch to add the two extra DECOs was rejected because the values chosen were based on those in this patch, which were deemed incorrect by people familiar with LIODN assignment expertise (not me - I've just identified these values equal to those that were identified as wrong). Plus, if I'd had reviewed this, it would have four DECOs by now.
Ok, I'll just wait until someone tells me what changes to make to this code.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale