Hi David,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:30:35PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:03:36PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote:
The libfdt overlay support introduces a bunch of new includes and functions.
Make sure we are able to build it by adding the needed glue.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com
include/libfdt_env.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/libfdt_env.h b/include/libfdt_env.h index 273b5d30f867..2d2196031332 100644 --- a/include/libfdt_env.h +++ b/include/libfdt_env.h @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ typedef __be64 fdt64_t; #define fdt64_to_cpu(x) be64_to_cpu(x) #define cpu_to_fdt64(x) cpu_to_be64(x)
+#ifdef __UBOOT__ +#include "malloc.h" +#include "vsprintf.h"
+#define strtol(cp, endp, base) simple_strtol(cp, endp, base) +#endif
/* adding a ramdisk needs 0x44 bytes in version 2008.10 */ #define FDT_RAMDISK_OVERHEAD 0x80
We need to figure out what the upstream libfdt/dtc maintainer’s take is on this is. For u-boot we’re fine and for now it’s OK.
These were sent to the upstream dtc list as well.
The concept is fine, but there are a number of problems in the implementation. I sent detailed review comments on the upstream versions, haven't seen a respin yet.
Yes, thanks a lot for your comments, I'll address them and resend a new serie.
(it might not be before a couple of weeks though).
Thanks! Maxime