On 07/20/2016 06:05 PM, York Sun wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: york sun Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:05 AM To: Qiang Zhao qiang.zhao@nxp.com Cc: Xiaobo Xie xiaobo.xie@nxp.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Roy Zang roy.zang@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for down-training issue"
On 04/20/2016 06:12 PM, York Sun wrote:
+Roy to comment on iNIC.
On 04/20/2016 06:05 PM, Qiang Zhao wrote:
On 04/21/2016 12:58 AM, York Sun wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: York Sun [mailto:york.sun@nxp.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:58 AM To: Qiang Zhao qiang.zhao@nxp.com Cc: Xiaobo Xie xiaobo.xie@nxp.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for down-training issue"
On 04/11/2016 02:02 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
This reverts commit 5066e62847bddf6030262ade2aa3e7bcdc930037.
The reverted patch will block t2080RDB iNiC, it was a workaround for T2080QDS down-training issue, we need to revert it and find the root cause for T2080QDS down-training issue.
You have a bad wrap-back in commit message.
Does the workaround block anything? Can you revert it after figuring out the root cause?
Yes, it blocks t2080RDB and c29x when using them as iNIC. If revert it after figuring out the root cause, how about iNIC? And I am afraid of it is a hard way to find the root cause.
Qiang,
You delete the code gated by CONFIG_FSL_PCIE_RESET, and the macro for
T208xQDS.
How does that affect T2080RDB or C29x?
Qiang,
Do you have an update? If not, I will defer this patch.
There is no any update.
-Zhao Qiang