On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Stephen Warren swarren@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 02/12/2013 12:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Tom Warren twarren.nvidia@gmail.com wrote:
...
That's the current POR for Tegra DT use in upstream U-Boot, assuming I can find an up-to-date kernel with the latest DTS files (I'll use Stephen's swarren/linux-tegra.git/for-next until told otherwise).
Yes that was always my problem - finding what the kernel actually used, might use, etc.
I must say I find this quite puzzling; the kernel repos aren't exactly hidden.
Not hidden, but numerous. Perhaps I should have said 'can find _the correct_ kernel ...'. I've been pointed to 2 or 3 different repos over the course of these DT patches. I'm not a kernel guru, and I don't have the bandwidth to monitor kernel reflectors, etc. When I need something kernel-related, I resort to Google or asking you.
Tegra's kernel for-next is likely the best place right now as any DT changes typically go through that tree. However, on the off-chance any other maintainer picks up any changes, linux-next.git would have the latest bindings. That's all been true for a year or more.
That said, there is a move to either move the binding definitions and .dts files out of the kernel tree and/or stop taking changes to them through individual SoC trees, but perhaps through the device tree repo. If that does happen, I'll let you know.