Hi!
I don't this Albert is the problem, I am starting to suspect we simply lack custodian manpower in general. And I also suspect we're not quite inviting and attractive crowd, which is something we should discuss too ...
As I said privately, I believe we have way too many custodians...
Anyway, u-boot code looks similar to kernel code, but patch submission rules are really different.
Something like this could help..? Pavel
--- /dev/null 2014-10-09 01:15:57.354292026 +0200 +++ doc/SubmittingPatches 2014-10-09 23:58:53.058883776 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +Differences from kernel: + +* SPDX license headers are required. + +* puts() is preffered over single-argument prinf() + +* later versions of patch should come with "diff changelog" below "---" + +* subject should begin with tags, such as "arm: socfpga:" + +* should pass checkpatch \ No newline at end of file