On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 12:48:20PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
Things are broken, because Wolfgang refuses patches fixing problems on AT91 on principle. Removing support will cause more work for people because the existing patches to make things work will have to be modified...
Wolfgang is waiting for custodian to comment on patch. So far nothing happened. Please note that I'm the last one who wants to see support of this board removed. Also I'm all for applying patches you send to the mailing list (that serie 1,2,3,4,6,7,10,24) except for 24.noflash which seems a bit hackish (and yes I run into the very same problem this patch is trying to solve recently). If there is anything I can do to help them to get applied, just let me know.
What is the point of sabotaging others peoples efforts???
Removing non working code makes whole codebase cleaner. Sabotage is leaving non working code in repository without any will to at least consider applying patches... Anyway, who is responsible for AT91 code?
Best regards, ladis
Instead of wasting your time with the mainstream u-boot for the AT91, you could try out my patched u-boot-1.2.0-atmel at ftp://at91supp:support@81.80.104.162/ -> AT91 Third Party -> Linux_Host -> Source
I have a working dataflash support for most Atmel chips there (board = at91rm9200df). It also gets automatically built by the "buildroot" at the same location.
If you have any suggestions/patches, then I would be happy to add that.
Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users