
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Chee, Tien Fong tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 14:26 +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:19 PM Chee, Tien Fong tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 21:50 +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On 19.03.19 09:50, tien.fong.chee@intel.com wrote:
From: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
Increasing Malloc pool size up to 0x15000 is required to support FAT in SPL . The result of calculation is come from after applying some few patches
"Some few patches"? What should that mean? Either you refer to the current state or you can refer to the patchwork items.
which are required for optimizing vfat and maximizing resusable of the memory pool, and then followed by the size required come from default max cluster(0x10000) + others(0x2000) + additional memory for headroom(0x3000). Previous records of describing these few patches can be checked from here [v7]: https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg3145 11.h tml .
Why do you refer to mail-archive.com instead of patchwork?
Contains the cover letter in case reviewer need to know more information.
I think you understood that wrong. Why do you reference a 3rd party host (mail-archive.com) instead of the official list archive or patchwork?
And please note patchwork keeps the cover letter as well.
Okay, i can't find any cover letter from this link https://patchwork.oz labs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=&submitter=70549&state=*&q=&archive =both&delegate= . Do you know how to find it?
- Go to one of the patches of v7, e.g.: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1034279/ - click "Related" - click the 0/7 link and you'll get the cover letter: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1034282/
Also note, this is the commit message which will got into the git lot. Referencing v7 and older history seems misplaced here. Better move it below the '---'.
Okay, noted. So, what should i do with this patch now? Should i send next version with new commit message?
Well, I don't really care about which host you reference, but yes, please send a version that doesn't contain such a reference in the commit log.
Other than that, the series is, well, good enough for me to be accepted, I guess.
Regards, Simon
Thanks. TF
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee tien.fong.chee@intel.com
changes for v12
- Improved the commit messages.
changes for v11
- No changes.
changes for v10
- No changes.
changes for v9
- No changes.
changes for v8
- Moved the FIT related configs to the patch of configuration
for FPGA SoCFPGA A10 SoCDK.
changes for v7
- Keep minimal configs.
include/configs/socfpga_common.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h index 181af9b646..22533036ed 100644 --- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ /*
- Copyright (C) 2012 Altera Corporation <www.altera.com>
*/ #ifndef __CONFIG_SOCFPGA_COMMON_H__ #define __CONFIG_SOCFPGA_COMMON_H__
- Copyright (C) 2012-2019 Altera Corporation <www.altera.com>
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void); #if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10) /* SPL memory allocation configuration, this is for FAT implementation */ #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START -#define CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE 0x00010000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE 0x00015000 #define CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_S IZE - \ CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SI ZE + \ CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR )