Dear Tor Krill,
In message 1277366121-14683-1-git-send-email-tor@excito.com you wrote:
Today the kirkwood egiga driver assumes that phy addresses are consecutive from a base address.
Our new board design using this cpu unfortunately has a non contiguous addressing of its phys and thus doesn't work with the current implementation.
This patchset updates the implementation to use an array of phy addresses as configuration.
You posted the a patchset wiht the same subject, patches and descriotion yesterday. Now you are reposting it, but
- without any comment why you are reposting
- without any marking if this is the same patches, or if this is a newer version of it
- without any information what has been changed since the previous posting.
Do you expect we spend time and resources trying to find out what you did and why?
It doesn't work like that. You are running the risk that your patches will be simply NAKed and ignored.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk