On Sep 3, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 08:58 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping covered the last page of memory which we wanted to copy to.
We now change the physical address of the reset page TLB to map to the true physical location of the boot page code, copy and than set the TLB back to its 1:1 mapping of the reset page.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c index 2df55c7..fa65bed 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <ioports.h> #include <lmb.h> #include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/mmu.h> #include "mp.h"
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; @@ -209,8 +210,33 @@ void setup_mp(void) ulong fixup = (ulong)&__secondary_start_page; u32 bootpg = determine_mp_bootpg();
- memcpy((void *)bootpg, (void *)fixup, 4096);
- flush_cache(bootpg, 4096);
- /* look for the tlb covering the reset page, there better be one */
- int i = find_tlb_idx((void *)0xfffff000, 1);
- pq3_mp_up(bootpg);
- /* we found a match */
- if (i != -1) {
/* map reset page to bootpg so we can copy code there */disable_tlb(i);set_tlb(1, 0xfffff000, bootpg, /* tlb, epn, rpn */MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, MAS2_M, /* perms, wimge */0, i, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 1); /* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */memcpy((void *)0xfffff000, (void *)fixup, 4096);flush_cache(0xfffff000, 4096);disable_tlb(i);/* setup reset page back to 1:1, we'll use HW boot translation* to map this where we want*/set_tlb(1, 0xfffff000, 0xfffff000, /* tlb, epn, rpn */MAS3_SX|MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, MAS2_I, /* perms, wimge */0, i, BOOKE_PAGESZ_4K, 1); /* ts, esel, tsize, iprot */X-ES's mpc8572/8561 boards don't currently use 1 TLB to just map the 0xfffff000 region, we use same TLB that is used for flash (covering 0xf0000000-0xffffffff).
It looks like a fair number of other mpc85xx non-MP boards currently use the 0xfffff000 region for flash too. This patch wouldn't affect them, but I assume when those vendors produce a board with MP support, they'd like to keep the same memory map, in which case they'd run into the same issue as I'm having with not reserving the 0xfffffxxx region for BPTR use.
In any case, I was wondering if you'd be up for changing this patch to save/restore the TLB you're disabling instead of hardcoding the "restore". I could send a follow-up patch if you're OK with the concept too.
I'm fine w/the concept. I'm cleaning up some PCI code at this point so feel free to send me a patch to do this.
I feel like our use of the 0xfffff000 memory region is starting to make us the red headed stepchild of the mpc85xx MP family:)
:)
- k