10 Jan
2005
10 Jan
'05
4:53 p.m.
In 64-bit mode both 'long' and 'long long' types are 8 bytes. Therefore I think that [.l] and [.ll] is not good enough for 64-bit users. I can be even more explicitly and suggest [.8, .16, .32, .64]. What do you think?
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:12:28PM +0200, Tzachi Perelstein wrote:
Will it be ok to change it to [.b, .s, .w, .l] for 8, 16, 32, and 64? If it is not acceptable what do you suggest? new cmd_mem64.c? other?
I know I'm old-fashioned, but how about "[.b, .w, .l, .ll]"?