On 2/19/20 6:31 PM, Dalon L Westergreen wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 18:11 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/19/20 1:25 PM, chee.hong.ang@intel.com wrote:
From: Chee Hong Ang chee.hong.ang@intel.com Add board_fit_config_name_match() for matching board name withdevice tree files in FIT image. This will ensure correct DTBfile is loaded for different board type. Currently, we are notsupporting multiple device tree files in FIT image therefore thisfunction basically do nothing for now. Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang chee.hong.ang@intel.com--- arch/arm/mach- socfpga/board.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c b/arch/arm/mach- socfpga/board.cindex 7c8c05c..5757041 100644--- a/arch/arm/mach- socfpga/board.c+++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c@@ -86,3 +86,13 @@ int g_dnl_board_usb_cable_connected(void) return 1; } #endif++#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD+__weak int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name)
Why is this __weak ?
The intent is to allow users to override this in their specific board implementation.
OK. Please add that into the commit message.