Hi Michal,
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:27:27 +0200 Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com wrote:
In this case, savedefconfig was done based on configs/sandbox_defconfig which is empty for now, but which will have more options in the future.
No problem with that. The question and my concern is that every .config will contain this line and this is just one usage which is questionable. IMHO if there is no .config savedefconfig should failed to let user to know that something is wrong. But that's just my opinion.
Finally, I have posted a patch.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/380400/
Whereas, this case, savedefconfig failed, that is why the file is empty.
It doesn't look at it is failing - just don't use that default one.
You are right. It seems to exit successfully with doing nothing.
Best Regards Masahiro Yamada