Hi Maxime,
On 14 November 2016 at 14:09, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:44:42PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On 14 November 2016 at 13:12, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:14:57AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:16:39AM -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> +U_BOOT_DRIVER(ds2431) = { > + .name = "ds2431", > + .id = UCLASS_EEPROM, > + .ops = &ds2431_ops,
Do you want to add a .flags = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS here?
I don't know. I was kind of wondering why U-Boot relies on aliases so much, especially when the Linux DT maintainers are saying that aliases should be avoided entirely, and we'll won't be able to upstream those changes.
Bah. Do you have a pointer to some discussion about this handy?
Rob said this multiple times, but here is an example: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1609.1/00653.html
Well that's not really an explanation!
Don't shoot the messenger :)
I think I found some other discussion where they discuss it at length: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9133903/
The interesting part is when Rob Herring is involved.
Oh dear. That sounds like a change to me. I'm going to leave this one to Tom :-)
Regards, Simon