Hi Tom, Heinrich,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 14:34, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 09:58:50PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Am 4. November 2024 14:39:48 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org:
The package names are slightly different for arm64 and we don't seem to have a linux-image-kvm package. Provide a different set for arm64
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
tools/docker/Dockerfile | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/docker/Dockerfile b/tools/docker/Dockerfile index c9d794082c8..c4c3dc5a901 100644 --- a/tools/docker/Dockerfile +++ b/tools/docker/Dockerfile @@ -39,7 +39,12 @@ RUN wget -O - https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_ RUN wget -O - https://github.com/foss-xtensa/toolchain/releases/download/2020.07/x86_64-20... | tar -C /opt -xz
# Update and install things from apt now -RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \ +RUN if [ "$TARGETPLATFORM" = "linux/arm64" ]; then \
Please, use 'arm64' and not 'linux/arm64' as variable value.
Getting back to your previous comment about documenting these variables, I took it that these are NOT free-form but rather what Docker (et al) require for proper multi-architecture containering.
Yes, that's my understanding (limited though it is so far)
Regards, Simon