27 Jun
2011
27 Jun
'11
10:55 p.m.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:50:46 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110627133435.31cd3271@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Good point. Eventually we can just add additional build rules for new object files (say, ".splo" instead of ".o") ?
No need for new extensions -- we should be able to use the target directory to influence rule selection.
But if we do not create a new hierarchy of target directories we will have the "normal" and the "spl" objects in parallel (and I don't want to delete one when building the other).
What's wrong with creating a new hierarchy of target directories? It would be like specifying a different output directory.
-Scott