This patch implements the basic callback hooks for hab_rvt_check_failsafe for BootROM code using the older BootROM address layout - in my test case the i.MX7. Code based on new BootROM callbacks will just do nothing and there's definitely a TODO to implement that extra functionality on the alternative BootROM API.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org Cc: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com Cc: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com Cc: Albert Aribaud albert.u.boot@aribaud.net Cc: Sven Ebenfeld sven.ebenfeld@gmail.com Cc: George McCollister george.mccollister@gmail.com Cc: Breno Matheus Lima brenomatheus@gmail.com --- arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c index 99834c5..17dac16 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c @@ -70,6 +70,21 @@ ((hab_rvt_exit_t *)HAB_RVT_EXIT) \ )
+static inline void hab_rvt_failsafe_new(void) +{ +} + +#define hab_rvt_failsafe_p \ +( \ + (is_mx6dqp()) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + (is_mx6dq() && (soc_rev() >= CHIP_REV_1_5)) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + (is_mx6sdl() && (soc_rev() >= CHIP_REV_1_2)) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)HAB_RVT_FAILSAFE) \ +) + static inline enum hab_status hab_rvt_check_target_new(enum hab_target target, const void *start, size_t bytes)