20 Apr
2009
20 Apr
'09
6:54 a.m.
On Saturday 18 April 2009 23:13:58 Peter Tyser wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 14:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 15:41:22 Peter Tyser wrote:
+unsigned int i2c_get_bus_speed(void)
- __attribute((weak, alias("__def_i2c_get_bus_speed")));
__attribute__ ?
Interesting, thanks for catching that. I blindly copied the weak functions in net/eth.c which also use the __attribute declaration. It looks like gcc treats __attribute and __attribute__ the same, but I couldn't find any definitive info on __attribute. I'll resubmit using __attribute__.
Anyone have a reason that we shouldn't replace all u-boot references to __attribute with __attribute__?
not that i know of ... using __XXX__ with gcc keywords tends to be preferred. -mike