On 26 July 2017 at 04:40, Philipp Tomsich philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com wrote:
The ITS file generated warnings due to @<num> designations in the naming which cause DTC to complain as follows: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/uboot@1 has a unit name, but no reg property Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/atf@1 has a unit name, but no reg property Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/pmu@1 has a unit name, but no reg property Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/fdt@1 has a unit name, but no reg property Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /configurations/conf@1 has a unit name, but no reg property
This removes the @<num> part from the names, as we only have a single image for each payload aspect (and only a single configuration) anyway.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com
Changes in v2: None
board/theobroma-systems/puma_rk3399/fit_spl_atf.its | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org