
18 Jun
2024
18 Jun
'24
5:54 p.m.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 15:24, Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com wrote:
Test that we don't have a /chosen/kaslr-seed property if we measure the device-tree.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_fdt.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_fdt.c b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_fdt.c index aa3b13ae3ab..066d9581432 100644 --- a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_fdt.c +++ b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_fdt.c @@ -227,6 +227,13 @@ static int execute(void) return EFI_ST_FAILURE; } }
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_MEASURE_DTB)) {
str = get_property(u"kaslr-seed", u"chosen");
if (str) {
efi_st_error("kaslr-seed with measured fdt\n");
return EFI_ST_FAILURE;
When does this run? efi_try_purge_kaslr_seed() tries to remove the kaslr-seed before measuring a DT. Are we safe enavbling the check here?
Thanks /Ilias
}
} if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV)) { u32 fdt_hartid;
-- 2.45.1