
HI,
-----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini@konsulko.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:32 AM To: Pankaj Bansal pankaj.bansal@nxp.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot@aribaud.net; Priyanka Jain priyanka.jain@nxp.com; Varun Sethi V.Sethi@nxp.com; Mingkai Hu mingkai.hu@nxp.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under X11
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:03:54AM +0530, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very impractical for other software components licensed under another license.
To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under license X11.
Cc: Priyanka Jain priyanka.jain@nxp.com Cc: Mingkai Hu mingkai.hu@nxp.com Cc: York Sun york.sun@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal pankaj.bansal@nxp.com
arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-lpuart.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds.dtsi | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-rdb.dts | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds-duart.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds-lpuart.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds.dtsi | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-rdb.dts | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi | 4 +--- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a-qds.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a-rdb.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-qds.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2081a-rdb.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2088a-rdb-qspi.dts | 2 +- 25 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
How do these changes match up to the kernel? Thanks!
The kernel dts files are GPLv2 and X11 dual licensed. E.g. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree...
To avoid dual licensing, we used X11 only. See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#X11License
-- Tom