
1 Nov
2009
1 Nov
'09
2 a.m.
Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4AEC53DB.6050509@free.fr you wrote:
Would a name such as "marvell.h" be more acceptable? This would be
Hm... I expect there will be little chance to see MAarvell IP blocks in non-Marvell SoCs, so this should work indeed. On the other hand, why not chose a name that works for other CPUs / SoCs as well. [So on second thought maybe your "soc.h" was not that bad a name.]
Let's see what others suggest.
While we wait for others' opinion, one quick question: do you prefer me to submit this rework of the Marvell IP/drivers as individual patches, one for each IP/driver, or as a single patch for the whole rework?
Amicalement,
--
Albert.