Hi Waldemar,
On 05/11/2015 01:32 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi, Andreas Bießmann wrote,
Hi Hans-Christian,
On 05/11/2015 01:19 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Around Mon 11 May 2015 13:07:22 +0200 or thereabout, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Andreas Bießmann (7): avr32: delete non generic board atngw100 avr32: delete non generic board favr-32-ezkit avr32: delete non generic board hammerhead avr32: delete non generic board mimc200 avr32: delete non generic board's atstk100{3,4,6} avr32: take maintainership for atstk1002 avr32: delete ancient board.c
If one were to prioritize, then keeping the atngw100 board would be great.
+1, but as said above, I want a run-time test and can't do it for my own. Waldemar talked to me lately to get his ngw100 up running current u-boot (2015.01 I think). So Waldemar, could you please do a runtime test for atngw100 and required adoptions? Or anyone else?
I can try a runtime test tommorow.
any progress? Could you run the test and was it (un)successful?
Andreas