13 Jan
2004
13 Jan
'04
7:54 p.m.
Anders,
Why is it so? Shouldn't AMD_ID_LV160B be just 0x49 or 0x2249 by the same reasoning? What is the reason for duplication of codes in the high and low order 16-bits and if it is supposed to be like this why not 28F128J3A => 0x00180018?
Actually, it is 0x00180018. So, the question is why duplicate the id in the high and low order 16 bits?
The only problem seems to be INTEL_ID_28F128J3 which should be the same as INTEL_ID_28F128J3A per datasheet.
Regards, Tolunay