Hello Jaehoon,
On 10/28/2015 01:30 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, Przemyslaw.
On 10/28/2015 08:33 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Jaehoon,
On 10/28/2015 07:33 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi, All.
On 10/05/2015 08:47 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Add more debug printfs in do_sdhci_init() for calls that can potentially fail.
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index b203bee..15ecfee 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -101,29 +101,31 @@ struct sdhci_host sdhci_host[SDHCI_MAX_HOSTS];
static int do_sdhci_init(struct sdhci_host *host) {
- int dev_id, flag;
- int err = 0;
int dev_id, flag, ret;
flag = host->bus_width == 8 ? PINMUX_FLAG_8BIT_MODE : PINMUX_FLAG_NONE; dev_id = host->index + PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0;
if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->pwr_gpio)) { dm_gpio_set_value(&host->pwr_gpio, 1);
err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);if (err) {
ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);if (ret) { debug("MMC not configured\n");
return err;
return ret; } } if (dm_gpio_is_valid(&host->cd_gpio)) {
if (dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio))
ret = dm_gpio_get_value(&host->cd_gpio);if (ret) {debug("no SD card detected (%d)\n", ret); return -ENODEV;}This patch was already applied. But i didn't know why used "ret" at here. If cd-gpio is active-high, this should be always returned "no SD card detected". Even if commonly cd-gpio is active-low, we don't know whether cd-gpio is active-low or not.
And dm_gpio_get_value() should be returned error for only one case.
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
Could you precise, where is the problem exactly? The active low or high can be set in device tree, so the code can be still common.
How can active low or high be set in device tree? I can't find any information.
It is defined here: arch/arm/dts/include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h and is used by gpio's phandle, e.g.: sdhci@12530000 { samsung,bus-width = <4>; samsung,timing = <1 2 3>; cd-gpios = <&gpk2 2 0>; }
Anyway, I have tested on Odroid-x2 board. And i have tried to boot with SD-card. In that case, host can't detect SD-card.
Can you also see this error: ----------------------------------------------------------- DRAM: 2 GiB __of_translate_address: Bad cell count for gpf0 __of_translate_address: Bad cell count for gpj0 __of_translate_address: Bad cell count for gpk0 __of_translate_address: Bad cell count for gpm0 __of_translate_address: Bad cell count for gpx0 LDO20@VDDQ_EMMC_1.8V: set 1800000 uV; enabling LDO22@VDDQ_EMMC_2.8V: set 2800000 uV; enabling LDO21@TFLASH_2.8V: set 2800000 uV; enabling MMC: process_nodes: failed to initialize dev 0 (-19) -----------------------------------------------------------
This is caused by this commit: commit ef5cd33064f83db6f6cfe774ecdb36e32ac1d232 dm: core: Enable optional use of fdt_translate_address()
And it's not related to GPIO configuration.
Right now, I'm looking on how to fix it.
MMC: process_nodes: failed to initialize dev 0 (-19)
After Enable debug message..
no SD card detected (1) process_nodes: failed to initialize dev 0 (-19)
no SD card detected (1) -> 1 is just gpio value. it should be to 0. Do you distinguish between 0 and 1? We don't know whether gpio is active-low or high. I don't think that included information.
It's just my thinking...other people should be helpful.
And I'm making some patches...and below is one of them for detecting SD-card.
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: s5p_sdhci: change the flags of cd-gpio to ACTIVE_LOW
In case of exynos, "cd-gpio" is commonly used the active-low. So it changed the flags of gpio from GPIOD_IS_IN to GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung jh80.chung@samsung.com
drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c index 15ecfee..26a8fe8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int sdhci_get_config(const void *blob, int node, struct sdhci_host *host) gpio_request_by_name_nodev(blob, node, "pwr-gpios", 0, &host->pwr_gpio, GPIOD_IS_OUT); gpio_request_by_name_nodev(blob, node, "cd-gpios", 0, &host->cd_gpio,
GPIOD_IS_IN);
GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW);
This change, is a bad idea.
We uses this flag to set the direction (input/output), and also the flag GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW is checked for output only in this function.
Your commit fixes the SD detection issue by a mistake.
I will send the fix in a moment, then you will see what is wrong.
return 0;} @@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ static int process_nodes(const void *blob, int node_list[], int count)
ret = sdhci_get_config(blob, node, host); if (ret) {
printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d (%d)\n", __func__, i, ret);
printf("%s: failed to decode dev %d (%d)\n",__func__, i, ret); failed++; continue; }--
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
And the ret value can inform, if card is not detected or the error is in GPIO subsystem(ret < 0). So where is the problem?
err = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);if (err) {
ret = exynos_pinmux_config(dev_id, flag);if (ret) { printf("external SD not configured\n");
return err;
return ret; } }Best regards,
Best regards,