
29 Aug
2017
29 Aug
'17
10:25 a.m.
Hi Andy,
On 29.08.2017 06:49, Bin Meng wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have a preliminary working ACPI tables for Intel Edison (to replace ugly SFI provided by firmware). What I would like to ask is how better from your point of view to proceed.
I have apparently not all devices covered in the tables, though I have almost stable code which brings ACPI support to Edison.
I see few options here: 0. Do nothing :-)
- Apply ACPI code, but leave no tables applied yet.
- Apply both and amend whenever problem occurs.
- Postpone until kernel will be ready for that (*)
- ...other option...?
I would vote for option 2.
+1
Thanks, Stefan