
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wens@csie.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki@gmail.com wrote:
Add simple and meaningful kconfig option for prcm.c instead of using MACH type on Makefile.
PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) is considered as a Multi-Functional Device, so used the same on Kconfig definition.
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig index 1fededd..2b9f48b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ config SPL_LDSCRIPT config IDENT_STRING default " Allwinner Technology"
+config MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
bool "Allwinner A31 PRCM controller"
help
Support for the PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit available
in A31 SoC.
Do these entries even need to be visible? It's not like it makes sense to toggle them independently. This applies to almost all the patches in this series.
True with PRCM and DRAM and others shouldn't relate to arch code and move to drivers in future.