Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 23:11 -0600, Nishanth Menon a écrit :
On 02/25/2015 03:23 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 08:32 -0600, menon.nishanth@gmail.com a
[...]
That said, Paul, if you could contribute patches to the effect of integrating all these platforms to ti_*_common.h, that'd be great.
I will try to come up with a common configuration for omap3 (and possibly omap4 and omap5 too). Do you mind if I drop the ti_ prefix? I don't feel it's relevant to mention the chip manufacturer there, especially when it's not used anywhere else in the tree (except for the boards that are actually procuced by TI such as the evms, etc).
I think we have maintained ti_ prefix for omap3,4,5 etc.. might make sense to retain that.. but then, I am no decision maker in that regards, I suggest posting a proposal and seeing feedback folks have w.r.t.
I have started looking at the situation for am33xx, omap3, omap4 and omap5 and I'll post a RFC at some point in the near future. I'm a bit busy right now and this is not high priority since your latest series includes all the configs for the affected omap3 boards.