20 May
2005
20 May
'05
1:42 a.m.
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 01:20 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 1116541993.5153.22.camel@gaston you wrote:
Yes, small *is* beautiful.
Did you read the "optional" above ? Let me repeat _AGAIN_ here: the bootloader doesn't _need_ ANY code to deal with the device-tree if you decide to just build the blob once for all, and embed it "as is".
And the blob has a zero memory footprint or what?
Don't be ridiculous please. But definitely a small one.
Face it, there will NOT be any other way that will be accepted upstream to boot a ppc64 kernel.
Then let's just stop here. We're just wasting time if there is nothing to discuss any more.
You are welcome to discuss aspects of the content of the proposal.
Ben.