Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH ARM 1/3] s3c24x0 code style changes

15 Dec 2009


      Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20091215201449.GA4731@loki.buserror.net you wrote:
...
I don't follow -- why can't people base patches on the tree they're
expecting them to be applied to?
In the end, people expect to have their patches applied to mainline,
which means "master" or "next", right? Any custodian trees are just
staging areas on that way, and custodian should take care to keep he
difference between their trees (at least their master branches) to
mainline as small as possible. I always try to handle any pull
requests really quickly.
If I am supposed to test something, I don;t want to have to bother
about some 30+ custodian trees hanging around, and finding the right
branch in the right tree so test one patch and another combo for the
next patch.
See also http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches , bullet no. 3
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
I wrote my name at the top of the page. I wrote down  the  number  of
the  question  ``1''.  After much reflection I put a bracket round it
thus ``(1)''. But thereafter I could not think of anything  connected
with it that was either relevant or true.
                        - Sir Winston Churchill _My Early Life_ ch. 2