On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:16:51PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
On 11.11.2016 18:33, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
2016-11-11 17:04 GMT+01:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:26:05PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
DTC 1.2 reports these warnings: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /pmu has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /fixedregulator@0 has a unit name, but no reg property
This patch is fixing them.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
Have you addressed these in Linux as well?
Going to do so next week. Both should be in sync.
Agreed. I'd prefer to pull them in via Linux but at least once they're on their way into the right tree for upstream we can bring them in here as well (as I want to ensure future re-syncs are easy). Thanks!
I have sent them to Linux too. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467965.h... http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467967.h... http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467968.h...
OK.
For our case we have more dtses in u-boot especially for arm64 than in Linux.
Intentional or just boards that have not yet made it there?
Also u-boot,dm-pre-reloc AFAIK hasn't been validated via dt mailing list. I see one thread in 2015 without any resolution.
Yes, this is something that might get a re-visit someday, but is indeed local to U-Boot only for now.
That's why taking stuff from Linux is sort of goal but nothing what we can do without additional work.
So long as everything relevant to upstream has been posted upstream (and you're saying it is, so good, I'm happy) then we're in good shape here.