On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 7:32 AM Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
在2024年6月18日六月 上午12:29，Tom Rini写道： [...]
Acked-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
Can we please get either this, or https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240524210817.1953298-1-ra... merged for master? The number of false negatives in CI due to this is big issue for getting more contributors to use CI. Thanks.
It seems like CYCLIC doesn't have it's own custodian tree. How are we going to handle it in this case?
Note that in U-Boot it's less important to have a tree per sub-section and more important that custodians have a tree (and then use appropriate tags when sending pull requests).
-- Tom
Stefan and Tom,
I'm seeing CI issues here even with 5000us [1]: host bind 0 /tmp/sandbox/persistent-cyclic function wdt-gpio-level took too long: 5368us vs 5000us max
Best Regards,
Tim [1] https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=8737&view=log...