On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:57:13PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:51 Wed 24 Jun , Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:23:05PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke matthias@kaehlcke.net
El Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:19:40PM -0500 Scott Wood ha dit:
I get conflicts in kb9202.h. Is this against an arch tree, or does it need to be respun?
The previous patches were against v2009-03, as i had problems building the current git head for the kb9202 when i started working on the patch. Did you apply the first patch of this series when you got the conflict? This patch is based on the current HEAD.
No - if it depends on other patches that go through an arch tree, then this patch should go through that tree as well.
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com
Scott I've not follow this patch but for the arm part it's looks fine so I'll let you handle
It still does not apply to the current tree, so I cannot accept it as is.
The NAND tree is not an appropriate route for unrelated changes to a board config file (such as CONFIG_BOOTARGS/CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND) to go -- and even if it were, I don't have an easily applyable version of patch 1/2 (the mailing list archives mangle things).
Matthias, can you resend a patch that just adds the NAND driver (for me), and a separate patch that just touches the board config (for the arch tree)?
-Scott