Dear Hans de Goede,
In message 532D5238.6080606@redhat.com you wrote:
"These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable." This is not how we work. Patches have to implement specific features, or fix specific bugs. And they have to maintain bisectability of the code.
These patches do implement specific features, like dram init, timer/clk init, etc. They just don't enable them yet as by themselves they are not useful.
Well, then at least the commit meSsage needs some serious rework.
The patches also maintain bisectability since they don't touch any existing files until the patch 5 and 6 come into play, and the changes in patch 5 keep things compiling just fine.
I think I have seen some interdependencies between the patches - like referring to stuff that gets only added in later patches?
FWIW I believe the split-up Ian has done makes sense. But if you insist I guess we can merge patch 1-6 (the minimum set to get something working) into 1 big patch.
I did not look too thoroughly at the content. In any case, we need clear and descriptive commit messages, and proper attribution / SoB lines.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk