Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands

Hi Scott,

Grant Erickson wrote:

...

Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?

I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands (intentionally, that is)? If the answer is no, then we could make it the default.

I also vote for commands to be bad-block aware per default as I also already got bitten by that.

Cheers Detlev