On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Dan Malek wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
I see Dan Malek's name listed as the maintainer. I'm wondering who actually cares about this board?
Well, I do care. :-) I still use them. Pantelis did most of the kernel + u-boot FDT work with this board. It was one of the first boards that used FDT properly.
ask because this board is one of two that define: CONFIG_OF_HAS_BD_T CONFIG_OF_HAS_UBOOT_ENV
However I'm under the believe that these options aren't really used or need by this board (i know they aren't needed for the other).
I don't know what those mean any more. There were a couple of iterations of passing information with nicely formatted records before the FDT turned into what it is today. They may have been used for that.
They were mechanisms to pass the full u-boot environment and bd_t as nodes in the device tree. I'm not aware of any in tree kernel support that actually uses this information.
Does the stxxtc use it?
- k