
13 Nov
2013
13 Nov
'13
9:07 p.m.
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com wrote:
In the RFC e-mail change regarding README.imx6-something, I proposed that we replace the pad declaration form currently in use:
enum { MX6_PAD_SD3_DAT2__USDHC3_DAT2 = IOMUX_PAD(...) };
with macros of this form so that they can be pre-pended with MX6Q_ and MX6DL_ when we need both in an image (SPL?) that can run on either variant of processor.
MX6_PAD_DECL(SD3_DAT2__USDHC3_DAT2, ...)
I thinks this macro approach should work fine. Do we see any objections?
If we do this, then lining up the columns based on the first form doesn't make much sense.
Understood it now. Thanks for clarifying.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam