
On 7/8/24 1:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Do not apply bitwise AND to register value and expected value, only apply bitwise AND to register value and mask, and only then compare the result with expected value that the function polls for.
Fixes: b49105320a5b ("stm32mp: psci: Implement PSCI system suspend and DRAM SSR") Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
Cc: Patrice Chotard patrice.chotard@foss.st.com Cc: Patrick Delaunay patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: uboot-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/psci.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/psci.c b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/psci.c index e99103910d9..ffdafea464d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/psci.c @@ -393,8 +393,7 @@ static int __secure secure_waitbits(u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 val) asm volatile("mrrc p15, 0, %Q0, %R0, c14" : "=r" (start)); for (;;) { tmp = readl(reg);
tmp &= mask;
if ((tmp & val) == val)
asm volatile("mrrc p15, 0, %Q0, %R0, c14" : "=r" (end)); if ((end - start) > delay)if ((tmp & mask) == val) return 0;
I hope this bugfix will make it into 2024.10 , can you prepare a bugfix PR for 2024.10 ?