
31 Mar
2011
31 Mar
'11
5:58 p.m.
Dear Lei Wen,
In message 1301586774-25447-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com you wrote:
Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the responding register according to CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE.
Can you please explain on what board, and with which tool chain, you see any problems?
+- CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MAX_REG_SIZE:
Define the ns16550 max register size,
if the CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE is smaller than this value,
use padding to fill those gap.
This makes no sense to me. A register is always one specific size, so the term "MAX_REG_SIZE" is bogus.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Landru! Guide us!
-- A Beta 3-oid, "The Return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4