On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:48:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:49 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
So, it looks to me now as bikeshedding, otherwise where is the documentation which describes how this all stuff should work?
Can we go with the initial patch?
If it looks like some nightmare to fix the DM uclass, I suppose, but, is it really that bad off atm?
So, I have looked more, I even start creating patches and it's a deep hole. It looks like that class has nothing to do with the main purpose of watchdog. There is no integration into U-Boot watchdog infrastructure (to actually use it).
I'm about to test what I have, I need to correct a bit still, and will send a v3 using old approach. I will send patches against WDT class as RFC, but I'm not going to support them. My opinion is steady now -- that class is unusable in the current state.
P.S. If I'm missing something obvious I would like to hear it ASAP to make my driver use that class.