
30 Oct
2018
30 Oct
'18
5:59 p.m.
On 10/30/2018 04:33 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 30.10.18 16:18, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Of course would this be good. But perhaps we can make this SPL > binary size check "better" by not changing the INIT_RAM_SIZE > define. Its definitely possible - I just don't know how hard > (I didn't look into this).
INIT_RAM_SIZE should reflect reality IMO
Right. I'll check how the SPL size check works with different offsets then.
So for this patch: Acked-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com mailto:simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Since this is a bugfix, will it be merged for 2018.11?
I'll pick it if Stefan is fine with it (I guess he is) ?
Yes, I am. ;)
Applied.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut