Hi Neha,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 21:41, Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com wrote:
Hi Simon
On 11/03/23 07:17, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Neha,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 03:51, Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com wrote:
Currently, bintool supports external compilable tools as single executable files. Adding support for git repos that can be used to run non-compilable scripting tools that cannot otherwise be present in binman.
Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis n-francis@ti.com
Changes in v3: - moved back to using DOWNLOAD_DIR as community is making relevant changes - extended coverage for bintool_test.py - added function comment for new parameter
Changes in v2: - added parameter to obtain path to download the directory optionally, enables flexibility to avoid using DOWNLOAD_DESTDIR - added test to bintool_test.py - s/FETCH_NO_BUILD/FETCH_SOURCE - code reformatting
tools/binman/bintool.py | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- tools/binman/bintool_test.py | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/binman/btool/_testing.py | 4 +++ tools/patman/tools.py | 2 +- 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
I am OK with doing this but worried that it will be used for shell scripts, which we are trying to avoid.
The code looks OK for now. Perhaps we can revisit this when we have a use case? I also think we should have each tool individually shown in the list, rather than having them be 'hidden' behind a btool.
I get the intention, let me know your reply to our thread [1] and we can work on it from there.
OK I replied to that.
- Simon
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230224120340.587786-1-n-f...
-- Thanking You Neha Malcom Francis