Hi,
No it's used another place. that's reason not static function pointer. I'll update it soon.
Thank you, Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
There apparantly is no reason for having "onenand_read_page" abstracted. Besides, it's static data which causes trouble.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.vasut@gmail.com
onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c | 9 +++------ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c b/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c index 8d0df81..008d73a 100644 --- a/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c +++ b/onenand_ipl/onenand_read.c @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ extern void *memcpy32(void *dest, void *src, int size); #endif
-int (*onenand_read_page)(ulong block, ulong page, u_char *buf, int pagesize);
/* read a page with ECC */ static int generic_onenand_read_page(ulong block, ulong page, u_char * buf, int pagesize) @@ -122,8 +120,6 @@ int onenand_read_block(unsigned char *buf) int pagesize, erasesize, erase_shift; int page_is_4KiB = 0;
- onenand_read_page = generic_onenand_read_page;
onenand_generic_init(&page_is_4KiB, &page);
if (page_is_4KiB) { @@ -139,10 +135,11 @@ int onenand_read_block(unsigned char *buf)
/* NOTE: you must read page from page 1 of block 0 */ /* read the block page by page */
for (block = 0; block < nblocks; block++) { for (; page < ONENAND_PAGES_PER_BLOCK; page++) {
- if (onenand_read_page(block, page, buf + offset,
- pagesize)) {
- if (generic_onenand_read_page(block, page,
- buf + offset, pagesize)) {
/* This block is bad. Skip it * and read next block */ offset -= page * pagesize; -- 1.7.1
U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot