Dear Jamie,
In message loom.20110927T050021-301@post.gmane.org you wrote:
Not anymore. Because no one fixed this board in the last two years, the board was removed from U-Boot mainline. It is not supported.
...
That's too bad. I've been developing for the board for the past 3 years and only recently have been given the opportunity to re-examine the loader and root file system.
It would be trivial to re-add the board if there is someone who actively maintains the related code.
#if defined(CONFIG_AT91RM9200) -# include <asm/arch/at91rm9200.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91rm9200.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9260) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20) || \ defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9XE) -# include <asm/arch/at91sam9260.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9261) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G10) -# include <asm/arch/at91sam9261.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91sam9261.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9263) -# include <asm/arch/at91sam9263.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91sam9263.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9RL) -# include <asm/arch/at91sam9rl.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91sam9rl.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G45) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9M10G45) -# include <asm/arch/at91sam9g45.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91sam9g45.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91CAP9) -# include <asm/arch/at91cap9.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91cap9.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_AT91X40) -# include <asm/arch/at91x40.h> +# include <asm/arch-at91/at91x40.h>
All these modifications are bogus and should be removed. They are not needed either.
diff --git a/include/configs/m501sk.h b/include/configs/m501sk.h index 68f0415..55b9154 100644 --- a/include/configs/m501sk.h +++ b/include/configs/m501sk.h @@ -162,7 +162,9 @@
#define CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS 1 #define PHYS_SDRAM 0x20000000 -#define PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE 0x2000000 /* 32 megs */ +#define PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE 0x4000000 /* 64 megs */ +#define CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE PHYS_SDRAM +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR (PHYS_SDRAM + (PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE >> 13))
This is a highly cryptic way to say "+ 8192" - is there any rationale for such an unreadable way to express this?
#define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START 0x21000000 /* PHYS_SDRAM */ /* CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START + PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE - 262144 */
Hm - after reverting commit b1a2bd4 and then applying your patches, I still get:
Configuring for m501sk board... make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/libat91rm9200.o] Error 2
Sorry, this does not work.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk