Hi Robert,
Thanks for the patches.
On 22/05/2024 12:13, Robert Marko wrote:
IPQ4019 ESS EDMA support is not yet in upstream Linux, and even when eventually it is merged the node will not be compatible with U-Boot driver as the Linux driver properly models the internal switch.
Is this going to cause dtc compile errors when the node eventually does land upstream and gets pulled into U-Boot?
How hard would it be to adjust the U-Boot driver to work with the upstream bindings?
Kind regards,
So, lets add the U-Boot additions DTSI for ESS EDMA for now.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko robert.marko@sartura.hr
arch/arm/dts/qcom-ipq4019-u-boot.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/qcom-ipq4019-u-boot.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/qcom-ipq4019-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/qcom-ipq4019-u-boot.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f70ef5c9a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/dts/qcom-ipq4019-u-boot.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT +/ {
- soc {
edma: edma@c080000 {compatible = "qcom,ess-edma";reg = <0xc080000 0x8000>, <0x98000 0x800>, <0xc000000 0x80000>;reg-names = "edma", "psgmii_phy", "switch";#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <1>;resets = <&gcc ESS_PSGMII_ARES>, <&gcc ESS_RESET>;reset-names = "psgmii", "ess";clocks = <&gcc GCC_ESS_CLK>;clock-names = "ess";status = "disabled";switch_ports: switch-ports {phy-mode = "psgmii";};};- };
+};
+&mdio {
- psgmiiphy: psgmii-phy@5 {
reg = <5>;- };
+};