
On 5/28/21 6:18 PM, Bruno Thomsen wrote:
Den tor. 27. maj 2021 kl. 09.15 skrev Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com:
On 5/26/21 9:57 PM, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
Use the more generic reset-gpios propery name.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz jorge@foundries.io
doc/device-tree-bindings/tpm2/tis-tpm2-spi.txt | 2 +- drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/device-tree-bindings/tpm2/tis-tpm2-spi.txt b/doc/device-tree-bindings/tpm2/tis-tpm2-spi.txt index 3a2ee4bd17..bbcd12950f 100644 --- a/doc/device-tree-bindings/tpm2/tis-tpm2-spi.txt +++ b/doc/device-tree-bindings/tpm2/tis-tpm2-spi.txt @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Required properties:
- reg : SPI Chip select
Optional properties: -- gpio-reset : Reset GPIO (if not connected to the SoC reset line) +- reset-gpios : Reset GPIO (if not connected to the SoC reset line)
- spi-max-frequency : See spi-bus.txt
Example: diff --git a/drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c b/drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c index 4b33ac8fd3..94ac52d9ce 100644 --- a/drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c +++ b/drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_probe(struct udevice *dev) if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_GPIO)) { struct gpio_desc reset_gpio;
ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-reset", 0,
ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "reset-gpios", 0, &reset_gpio, GPIOD_IS_OUT); if (ret) { log(LOGC_NONE, LOGL_NOTICE, "%s: missing reset GPIO\n",
I think you should deprecate gpio-reset but keep supporting that option with any warning and add code for reset-gpios.
Also would be good to add it as optional property to Linux kernel to keep it in sync.
Hi
The reason the Linux kernel does not have a TPM reset signal, is that being able to reset the chip from software is a vulnerability. There was a discussion on it over on the Barebox mailing list a while ago.
TLDR: TPM reset needs to follow SOC reset.
I expect chip has the reset in both cases and it is just about who should be calling it. But we should be using the same DT for u-boot and Linux. It means it should be handled properly but described properly.
Thanks, Michal