On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:14:31PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/1/27 下午8:01, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:42:30AM +0100, matthias.bgg@kernel.org wrote:
From: Matthias Brugger mbrugger@suse.com
Since commit 565a4147d17a ("fs: btrfs: Add more checksum algorithms") btrfs uses the sha256 checksum algorithm. But Kconfig lacks to select it. This leads to compilation errors: fs/built-in.o: In function `hash_sha256': fs/btrfs/crypto/hash.c:25: undefined reference to `sha256_starts' fs/btrfs/crypto/hash.c:26: undefined reference to `sha256_update' fs/btrfs/crypto/hash.c:27: undefined reference to `sha256_finish'
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger mbrugger@suse.com
So this is a fix for u-boot, got me confused and not for the first time as there's Kconfig and the same fs/btrfs/ directory structure.
Well, sometimes too unified file structure/code base can also be a problem.
Considering I'm also going to continue cross-porting more code to U-boot, any recommendation on this? Using different prefix?
If it's a series then please mention u-boot in the cover letter, no need to change the patches, I'll go check CC if I'm too confused about the patch.