On Sep 8, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk wd@denx.de
v2: Fix building for TQM8548_BE
On TQM8548_BE, building failed like that: Configuring for TQM85xx board... common/libcommon.a(cmd_mtdparts.o): In function `part_validate_eraseblock': /home/wd/git/u-boot/work/common/cmd_mtdparts.c:316: undefined reference to `get_mtd_device_nm' common/libcommon.a(cmd_mtdparts.o): In function `mtd_device_validate': /home/wd/git/u-boot/work/common/cmd_mtdparts.c:706: undefined reference to `get_mtd_device_nm' make: *** [u-boot] Error 1
This was because CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS was defined after it was used. Move the part that uses it after the #define. v3: Fix "undefined reference to `get_mtd_device_nm'" errors for non-8548 boards; build-tested with ELDK 4.2 on TQM8540, TQM8541, TQM8548, TQM8548_AG, TQM8548_BE, TQM8555 and TQM8560
include/configs/TQM85xx.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++ +-------------------- 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Did this build ok w/o any warnings on TQM8540?
I'm seeing:
[galak@komodo u-boot-85xx]$ ./MAKEALL TQM8540 ... TQM8540 (MPC8540) Configuring for TQM85xx board... /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .text lma 0xfffc0000 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .rodata lma 0xffff13a4 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .reloc lma 0xffffc400 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .data lma 0xffffdc30 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .data.rel.ro.local lma 0xffffe964 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .data.rel lma 0xffffe9e4 overlaps previous sections /opt/eldk/4.2/ppc-linux-x86/usr/bin/ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .data.rel.local lma 0xfffff380 overlaps previous sections text data bss dec hex filename 247104 16992 35304 299400 49188 ./u-boot
Which effective says to me we've run out of space in the image.
- k