28 Oct
2023
28 Oct
'23
3:26 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 07:20:14AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka@siemens.com
The "simpler" the logic, the higher the probability to not test and get things wrong, again: The absence of a "-PG2" suffix is not sufficient to derive that we are on PG1. There is also "IOT2050-ADVANCED-M2".
Finally fix that by exactly matching against the two PG1 device names.
While changing this, we can also drop the not really needed check for !board_is_sr1 in board_is_m2 and call the boards by their names ("board_is_pg1").
Reported-and-tested-by: Bao Cheng Su baocheng.su@siemens.com Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom