30 Aug
2007
30 Aug
'07
12:09 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 05:52:18PM -0400, Ben Warren wrote:
the 17 least significant (from the left) bits
...more commonly known as the "most significant bits". :-P
-Scott
Ah yes, 0 > 31... No wonder I was never much of a mathlete
Just because they number them backwards doesn't change which ones are more significant. :-)
-Scott