Hi Marek,
On 1 June 2016 at 07:36, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 05/31/2016 08:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 31 May 2016 at 05:55, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:00:24PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Tweak the tiny printf code to also provide similarly tiny sprintf() implementation. This is not comformant with POSIX for sure, but it keeps the size down while still behaving rather reasonably.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
Also please see this one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/622267/
It uses a function passed in.
Oh, I knew I saw some s*printf() stuff from you. Works for me :)
OK good. It works for me too but I'm sure it can be improved (code size, use of division, etc.), so see how you go.
Regards, Simon